To get an idea of the size of your English vocabulary have a go at the test on this site. It takes about five minutes or so and is anonymous, although the researchers would welcome your telling them your year of birth and gender, as well as saying whether English is your native language (no need to register or give other details).
You just tick a word if you know at least one meaning for it - you don't tick it if you've seen the word but don't know what it means. Words start off very easy eg like, work, enough, but then get more difficult, then very difficult such as tattermedalion, pule and hypnopompic.
The project is part of an independent American-Brazilian project and the researchers claim it works for everyone -- native speakers, non-native speakers, children, or college professors.
The maximum score is 45,000 words. Some linguists would say that many people know more than that.
You don't need to look up the words you don't know in a dictionary; the site has links to the definitions of hard words in the list, those found fewer than 3 times per hundred million words. You might not find all of these words hard; it depends on your interests and what you read -- malapropism is among them, as are uxoricide, tenebrous, bruit, embonpoint and deracinate, which don't strike me as being all that difficult, although I suppose it helps if you know Latin and French.
Hi Susan:
I took the test recently and found it very interesting. What I would find even more interesting would be a test surveying your entire vocabulary. You, for example, know other languages, as do I, and in addition to owning a vocabulary in one or more languages, many people know more than a smattering of vocabulary in additional languages. The methodology for such a test might be complicated - I simply don't know - but it would answer another question. By the way, you inadvertently reversed the letters in tatterdemalion.
Cheers,
Marc Leavitt
Posted by: Marc Leavitt | August 25, 2011 at 04:03 PM
Thanks, Marc, Sorry about the typo. I suppose you could replicate an experiment that Professor David Crystal did, namely ticking off all the words you know in, say, 20 or 30 random pages of a dictionary (or dictionaries if you wanted to include foreign languages), and extrapolating total vocabulary size from that. See this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8013859.stm
Posted by: Virtual Linguist | August 25, 2011 at 04:15 PM
The analysis, while predictable I guess, was interesting.
I'd love to see the model. In collecting data, what for example do they do with responses from people who did not take the SAT's?
Posted by: John | August 25, 2011 at 04:55 PM
Thanks, John. Good point. I didn't take the SATs, for one.
Posted by: Virtual Linguist | August 25, 2011 at 04:57 PM
I just re-took the quiz and entered "UK/IRELAND" and was not asked the SAT question; my score was as before.
Being totally confused over where I might eventually go to university, I did both O&C "O" Levels and SAT's.
Posted by: John | August 25, 2011 at 05:50 PM
I don't know what SATS is/are. Should I bother taking the test?
Posted by: Jemmy Hope | August 25, 2011 at 08:56 PM
Jemmy,
"SAT"s are Scholarship Aptitude Tests, used in the US in a way similar to O and A levels.
I took the quiz as someone who did take the SAT (true) and again, indicating that I was from the UK (false) and the question re: SATs was not aaked. My results were the same.
Posted by: John | August 25, 2011 at 09:58 PM
Thanks for replying to Jemmy, John. I was just about to. And thanks for your comment, Jemmy. You are extremely knowledgeable and well-read, it seems to me, so I'm sure you'll get a high score.
I've heard SATs being discussed among my children's friends who considered studying in the US. As John says, whereas in the UK a university offer might be AAB, in the US a SATs score would be given which you would have to achieve.
Actually we do have SATs in our education system in the UK, but they are tests taken by young children (aged 7, which is Key Stage 1, and aged 11, Key Stage 2).
Posted by: Virtual Linguist | August 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM
My comment was one of my pathetic attempts at humour (I know I should desist but I'm having trouble doing so).
My eleven year old granddaughter was telling me about her SATS results the other day. So I knew they were tests of some sort, but assumed they were like the end of year exams of my antediluvian schooldays.
There was a point of sorts to what I wrote, i.e., that we all have gaps in our knowledge, so a perfect score is unlikely to be attainable.
I did do the test out of curiosity, and in the cause of scientific research of course.
Posted by: Jemmy Hope | August 26, 2011 at 08:16 PM
I think it is unfair to make small kids take SATS, I think that up until kids are teenagers, they should not be tested and labelled as every child progresses at a different speed.
Posted by: English Translator | September 04, 2011 at 01:38 PM
I have two kids at school, one in Y2 and the other in Y5 and I am amazed how quick kids pick up reading and writing nowadays, my daughter who is currently in Y2 continues to astound me with her knowledge.
Posted by: Grace | October 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM