According to a team from Coventry University, texting can help children's spelling. They concluded that 'the ratio of textisms (text abbreviations) to total words used was positively associated with word reading, vocabulary, and phonological awareness measures'. I have read the paper (in the British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol 27, No. 1, March 2009, pp 145-161) and note that the authors say that in order to produce and read abbreviations such as 2nite for tonight, children need to have phonological awareness, and phonological awareness is associated with reading ability. Exposure to the printed word is also associated with reading ability, so texting rather than phoning friends provides that exposure. In particular, poorer readers may benefit more, as they may gain an exposure to the printed word in text messages, whereas they show little interest in books and this 'may increase motivation to engage with written communication without the constraints of school expectations'.
88 children aged from 10-12 took part in the study. They were given ten scenarios eg your friend's dad has got a brand new sports car and you'd love to have a ride in it, and then asked to write a suitable text message. The researchers noted the following features of the text messages:
- shortenings (bro, sis, tues)
- contractions (txt, plz, hmwk)
- omitting g from ing words (goin, swimmin, comin)
- omitting other final letters (hav, wil, couldn)
- omitting apostrophes (cant, wont, dads)
- acronyms (BBC, UK)
- initialisms (ttfn, lol, tb)
- symbols (@, &, :-o)
- letter/number homophones (2moro, l8r)
- misspellings (comming, bolinase, are [instead of our])
- non-conventional spellings (rite, skool, fone)
- accent stylisation (wiv, elp, anuva)
There was no evidence that use of or exposure to misspellings had a detrimental effect on children's ability to learn and use conventional spellings. Other findings included the fact that girls use more textisms than boys. This bears out the findings of previous studies with adults and older teenagers, namely that men often text items of information whereas women and girls often write longer chatty texts including emotional content eg they sign off with a x, and include expressions like omg and CUL8R.
There have been apocryphal stories printed in the tabloids about how children are writing school coursework and exam essays in 'textspeak' but when the researchers questioned the children about this, the pupils found the suggestion ludicrous and were well aware of the difference in the registers and the contexts in which they were appropriate.
Some children in this study were given their first mobile phone at the age of six, and the researchers found some evidence that owning a mobile phone early benefits literacy.
Here's the abstract of the paper, and here's a summary from the Daily Mail.